Scientists make printer that needs no ink, only water


Scientists have created a printer that uses just water to print instead of ink. After about 22 hours, the paper fades back to a plain sheet of white paper, allowing it to be reused. A group of chemists assert that the “water-jet” technology, that is capable of reprinting numerous times, spares people their money and saves trees.
"Several international statistics indicate that about 40 percent of office prints [are] taken to the waste paper basket after a single reading," Sean Xiao-An Zhang, a chemistry professor at Jilin University in China, who supervised the work, said. The paper alone is not ordinary at all, as it is coated with an invisible dye that shows color when water hits it. Later on, the print slowly fades away within a matter of 22 hours, but disappears much faster if exposed to high levels of heat. According to the designers, the print comes out clear and the technology is not expensive at all. "Based on 50 times of rewriting, the cost is only about 1 percent of the inkjet prints," Zhang said in a video. If one page were reused just 12 times, the cost would only be one-seventeenth that of its inkjet counterpart. Zhang said dye-treating the paper, of the type generally used for printing, added about five percent to its price, but this is more than compensated for by the saving on ink. There is no need to change the printer, but the ink cartridge needs to be filled up with water with the help of a syringe. "Water is a renewable resource and obviously poses no risk to the environment," said the study. In the past, such ventures using disappearing ink gave way to low-contrast results at a high price, with some methods using questionable chemicals. Oxazolidine, a dye compound, is the type of mix Zhang and his group used to print off the paper, with clear blue showing in less than one second after the water was put on the page. Four water colors can be printed for the time being, which are blue, magenta, gold, and purple. However, only one color can be printed off at a time. The team hopes to make the resolution and duration time for printing better. Zhang said the dyed paper was "very safe" but toxicity tests are underway on mice to be sure. Voice of Russia, The Sydney Morning Herald Source: http://sputniknews.com/
Read More........

Researchers Teach Machines To Learn Like Humans


A team of scientists has developed an algorithm that captures our learning abilities, enabling computers to recognize and draw simple visual concepts that are mostly indistinguishable from those created by humans. The work, which appears in the latest issue of the journal Science, marks a significant advance in the field -- one that dramatically shortens the time it takes computers to 'learn' new concepts and broadens their application to more creative tasks. A team of scientists has developed an algorithm that captures our learning abilities, enabling computers to recognize and draw simple visual concepts that are mostly indistinguishable from those created by humans. "Our results show that by reverse engineering how people think about a problem, we can develop better algorithms," explains Brenden Lake, a Moore-Sloan Data Science Fellow at New York University and the paper's lead author. "Moreover, this work points to promising methods to narrow the gap for other machine learning tasks." The paper's other authors were Ruslan Salakhutdinov, an assistant professor of Computer Science at the University of Toronto, and Joshua Tenenbaum, a professor at MIT in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and the Center for Brains, Minds and Machines. When humans are exposed to a new concept -- such as new piece of kitchen equipment, a new dance move, or a new letter in an unfamiliar alphabet -- they often need only a few examples to understand its make-up and recognize new instances. While machines can now replicate some pattern-recognition tasks previously done only by humans -- ATMs reading the numbers written on a check, for instance -- machines typically need to be given hundreds or thousands of examples to perform with similar accuracy. "It has been very difficult to build machines that require as little data as humans when learning a new concept," observes Salakhutdinov. "Replicating these abilities is an exciting area of research connecting machine learning, statistics, computer vision, and cognitive science." Salakhutdinov helped to launch recent interest in learning with 'deep neural networks,' in a paper published in Science almost 10 years ago with his doctoral advisor Geoffrey Hinton. Their algorithm learned the structure of 10 handwritten character concepts -- the digits 0-9 -- from 6,000 examples each, or a total of 60,000 training examples. In the work appearing in Science this week, the researchers sought to shorten the learning process and make it more akin to the way humans acquire and apply new knowledge -- i.e., learning from a small number of examples and performing a range of tasks, such as generating new examples of a concept or generating whole new concepts. To do so, they developed a 'Bayesian Program Learning' (BPL) framework, where concepts are represented as simple computer programs. For instance, the letter 'A' is represented by computer code -- resembling the work of a computer programmer -- that generates examples of that letter when the code is run. Yet no programmer is required during the learning process: the algorithm programs itself by constructing code to produce the letter it sees. Also, unlike standard computer programs that produce the same output every time they run, these probabilistic programs produce different outputs at each execution. This allows them to capture the way instances of a concept vary, such as the differences between how two people draw the letter 'A.' While standard pattern recognition algorithms represent concepts as configurations of pixels or collections of features, the BPL approach learns "generative models" of processes in the world, making learning a matter of 'model building' or 'explaining' the data provided to the algorithm. In the case of writing and recognizing letters, BPL is designed to capture both the causal and compositional properties of real-world processes, allowing the algorithm to use data more efficiently. The model also "learns to learn" by using knowledge from previous concepts to speed learning on new concepts -- e.g., using knowledge of the Latin alphabet to learn letters in the Greek alphabet. The authors applied their model to over 1,600 types of handwritten characters in 50 of the world's writing systems, including Sanskrit, Tibetan, Gujarati, Glagolitic -- and even invented characters such as those from the television series Futurama. In addition to testing the algorithm's ability to recognize new instances of a concept, the authors asked both humans and computers to reproduce a series of handwritten characters after being shown a single example of each character, or in some cases, to create new characters in the style of those it had been shown. The scientists then compared the outputs from both humans and machines through 'visual Turing tests.' Here, human judges were given paired examples of both the human and machine output, along with the original prompt, and asked to identify which of the symbols were produced by the computer. While judges' correct responses varied across characters, for each visual Turing test, fewer than 25 percent of judges performed significantly better than chance in assessing whether a machine or a human produced a given set of symbols. "Before they get to kindergarten, children learn to recognize new concepts from just a single example, and can even imagine new examples they haven't seen," notes Tenenbaum. "I've wanted to build models of these remarkable abilities since my own doctoral work in the late nineties. We are still far from building machines as smart as a human child, but this is the first time we have had a machine able to learn and use a large class of real-world concepts -- even simple visual concepts such as handwritten characters -- in ways that are hard to tell apart from humans."Contacts and sources:James Devitt, New York University Source: http://www.ineffableisland.com/Image: https://pixabay.com/, under Creative Commons CC0
Read More........

Now, a solar-toilet to turn human waste into power


The researchers plan to collect the hydrogen in a fuel cell to power a light or possibly even a self-cleaning mechanism, New Scientist reported.(Reuters) 
A scientist, who has been experimenting with solar-powered water treatment on a small scale, is now planning to incorporate the technology into a portable toilet. Michael Hoffmann at the California Institute of Technology found that sunlight powers an electrochemical reaction with human waste in water that generates microbe-killing oxidants and releases hydrogen gas. The researchers plan to collect the hydrogen in a fuel cell to power a light or possibly even a self-cleaning mechanism, New Scientist reported. Hoffmann received a grant this week from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to build a prototype. He says he can build one toilet for 2000 dollars and hopes to reduce the cost through design refinement and mass production.The grant is part of the Gates Foundation's latest global public health initiative to improve sanitation. Source: Indian Express
Read More........

Smart Electric Vehicle Balances on Two Wheels


San Francisco startup Lit Motors has created the C1, a two-wheel, self-balancing electric vehicle that brings the benefits of a motorcycle together with the safety and comfort of a car, according to founder and CTO Danny Kim. After speaking on stage at GreenBiz's Verge conference event just blocks from his Lit Motors Lab, he invited Intel Free Press to his warehouse to talk about the technology his team is building into the C1. To make the C1 affordable, appealing, safe and perform optimally, Kim turned to technologies such as computer aided design, stabilization mechanisms and embedded computer systems tied to sensors functioning somewhat like the sensors found under the hood of Android and Apple smartphones, says Kim. At the core of C1 are two 40-kilowatt electric motors and nestled beneath the driver seat are a set of heavy, fast-spinning gyroscopes, similar to the positioning and orientation technology used in the International Space Station and many satellites. These gyros put out 1,300-foot pounds of torque, providing enough balancing power "that it would take a baby elephant to knock it over," said Kim. In addition to the frame, body and battery recharging system there's an intricate nervous system spread throughout the vehicle that collects data and returns instructions processed by two Intel Core i7 desktop computer chips. This is what turns the motorcycle into a robot. "There are servos, gyro and traction motors, inertia and infra red sensors, temperature and heat sensors, really a myriad of sensors that all feed data to be processed," said Kim. "Through that process, a command goes to the gryos to tilt and lean the vehicle to keep it balanced or to lean into a turn -- it's all heavily based on the computer processing system." 
Read More........

The peculiar 3D model which allows parents to hold their baby... BEFORE it's even born

Expectant parents in Japan who can't wait to show the world what their baby will look like can now buy a 3D model of the foetus
Expectant parents who cannot wait to hold their new child can now buy a three-dimensional model of the foetus to cradle and show friends. Japanese inventors have devised a way to transform the commonplace ultrasound scan into an anatomically correct resin replica for parents to handle and keep as a memento. The nine-centimetre (3.6-inch) resin model of the white foetus, encased in a transparent block in the shape of the mother's body, is fashioned by a 3D printer after an MRI scan. FASOTEC, the company offering the 'Shape of an Angel' model, even offers parents a miniature version which could be a 'nice adornment to a mobile phone strap or key chain.' Tomohiro Kinoshita, of FASOTEC, said: 'As it is only once in a lifetime that you are pregnant with that child, we received requests for these kind of models from pregnant women who... do not want to forget the feelings and experience of that time.' The 'Shape of an
3D model of their unborn child's face
Angel' costs 100,000 yen (or around £760), and the company said the ideal time for a scan is around eight or nine months into the pregnancy. For those who would like a less pricey version, the company will start offering a 3D model of the face of the foetus at 50,000 yen - £380 - in December. It will use ultrasound images taken at a medical clinic in Tokyo that has forged a tie-up with the company. FASOTEC, originally a supplier of devices including 3D printers, uses a layering technique to build up three-dimensional structures. The company also produces 3D models of internal organs that can be used by doctors to plan surgery or by medical students for training, a spokesman said. It is also possible that models can be used in hospitals to better inform patients what their problems are, instead of relying on difficult-to-understand diagrams. The technology 'realises not only the form but also texture of the model -- for example making it hard or soft', the firm said . 'By making a model that is similar to a real organ or bone, one can simulate operations and practise different surgical techniques.' Kinoshita said the company hit upon the idea of making 3D models of unborn babies in the hope that people would become more aware of the technology. But there are medical benefits too. The company said some medics could also foresee diagnostic possibilities with the models that may help predict difficulties in the birthing process. Three-dimensional printers have been around for several decades but advances in the technology mean it is now gaining in popularity in several fields. The machines work in a similar way to an inkjet printer, but instead of ink they deposit layers of material on top of each other, gradually building up the product they are making. Where traditional manufacturing only becomes efficient with economies of scale because of the need to produce moulds, 3D printing is capable of producing single copies of relatively complicated objects. The technology is not yet advanced enough to build telephones or computers but it is already used to make components. Source: Ananta-Tec
Read More........

US biologist suggests sending DNA sequencing machine to Mars

By: Boris Pavlishchev, Vitaly Radnayev, Prominent US biologist Craig Venter, decoderof the human genome, has suggested sending a DNA sequencing machine to Mars to search for ancient microorganisms. If the machine finds anything there it will decode the genome and send its DNA sequence back to Earth where bioengineers would reconstruct a synthetic Martian gene. Russian experts welcome the idea and consider it to be a good alternative to costly projects requiring the delivery of soil samples from Mars to our planet. Mr. Venter believes that searching for life on Mars relying on DNA is much more reliable than using chemical experiments like the one currently carried out by Curiosity rover. He says that his method would help to find even the most exotic forms of life which cannot be searched with the use of traditional methods. DNA is the key to success of the project. This is the way new bacteria are discovered on Earth. Many forms can be detected only by analyzing its DNA. One of the most complicated tasks is to place a laboratory that would decode genes inside a Martian rover. The process of synthesizing a gene will be even a more challenging task to do as scientists have not yet learned how to get partially synthesized bacteria using genetic chains provided by donor microorganisms. But scientists have been working hard on this lately which means that if any bacteria arrive from Mars on our planet they will be synthesized. It was recently discovered that it takes a gene about 1.5 million years to break up after an organism’s death. Scientists, however, expect that due to its cold and dry climate conditions the Red Planet could contain ancient genomes aged billions of years since the time when Mars was covered with water and life existed there. If genomes found on Mars and on Earth turn out to be alike this will prove a theory that life originated somewhere in the solar system and was brought to Mars and to Earth by comets. Scientists hope to invent a machine already dubbed as ‘biological transmitter’ by 2018, when the second stage of the joint Russian-European ExoMars mission is due to begin. The transmitter will be then placed inside a Mars rover. Source: Voice of Russia
Read More........

Scientists to build ' Artificial human brain'; useful to cure brain disease

The human brain’s power could rival any machine. And now scientists are trying to build one using the world’s most powerful computer. It is intended to combine all the information so far uncovered about its mysterious workings - and replicate them on a screen, right down to the level ofindividual cells and molecules. Supercomputer will simulate the entire mind and will help fight against brain diseases If it works it could be revolutionary for understanding devastating neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s, and even shedding light into how we think, and make decisions. Leading the project is Professor Henry Markram based in Switzerland, who will be working with scientists from across Europe including the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute at Cambridge. They hope to complete it within 12 years. He said: ‘The complexity of the brain, with its billions of interconnected neurons, makes it hard for neuroscientists to truly understand how it works. ‘Simulating it will make it much easier – allowing them
to manipulate and measure any aspect of the brain.’Housed at a facility in Dusseldorf in Germany, the ‘brain’ will feature thousands of three-dimensional images built around a semi-circular ‘cockpit’ so scientists can virtually ‘fly’ around different areas and watch how they communicate with each other. It aims to integrate all the neuroscience research being carried out all over the world – an estimated 60,000 scientific papers every year - into one platform. The project has received some funding from the EU and has been shortlisted for a 1 billion euro (£825million) EU grant which will be decided next month. When complete it could be used to test new drugs, which could dramatically shorten the time required for licencing them than human trials, and pave the way for more intelligent robots and computers. But Prof Markram said: ‘This will, when successful, help two billion people annually who suffer from some type of brain impairment. They have also simulated part of a rat’s brain using a computer. But the human brain is a totally different proposition. Our brains have 100 billion neurons. Each one performs billions of ‘calculations’ per second – roughly similar to a desktop computer. So the brain computer will need to be able to do a billion billion calculations which will require the output of a nuclear power station. Finding a way to power the supercomputer will be one of the researchers’ major challenges. The brain is still largely an unknown quantity for researchers and unravelling its mysteries - which have evolved over millions of years - is widely considered the final frontier of science. Richard Walker, who works with Professor Markram, said: ‘Our brains consume tiny amounts of energy but they last for 90 or more years. ‘At the moment we cannot even afford to run the biggest computers we could build, so if we can find out how the brain works, it could bring huge advances.’ Disorders of the brain, from depression and mental illness to the diseases of old age such as Alzheimer’s – which affects 800,000 people in Britain– are also a growing problem. David Cameron recently pledged £66million to fund research into the ‘national crisis’ of dementia. Source: Ananta-Tech
Read More........

Biophysicists unravel secrets of genetic switch

"I hope this kind of experiment will lead to better understanding of how our own DNA is compacted into chromosomes, and how it unravels locally to become expressed," says biophysicist Laura Finzi.
By Carol Clark: When an invading bacterium or virus starts rummaging through the contents of a cell nucleus, using proteins like tiny hands to rearrange the host’s DNA strands, it can alter the host’s biological course. The invading proteins use specific binding, firmly grabbing onto particular sequences of DNA, to bend, kink and twist the DNA strands. The invaders also use non-specific binding to grasp any part of a DNA strand, but these seemingly random bonds are weak. Emory University biophysicists have experimentally demonstrated, for the fist time, how the nonspecific binding of a protein known as the lambda repressor, or C1 protein, bends DNA and helps it close a loop that switches off virulence. The researchers also captured the first measurements of that compaction. Their results, published in Physical Review E, support the idea that nonspecific binding is not so random after all, and plays a critical role in whether a pathogen remains dormant or turns virulent. “Our findings are the first direct and quantitative determination of non-specific binding and compaction of DNA,” says Laura Finzi, an Emory professor of biophysics whose lab led the study. “The data are relevant for the understanding of DNA physiology, and
Lysis plaques of lambda phage on E. coli bacteria.
the dynamic characteristics of an on-off switch for the expression of genes.”C1 is the repressor protein of the lambda bacteriophage, a virus that infects the bacterial species E. coli, and a common laboratory model for the study of gene transcription.The virus infects E. coli by injecting its DNA into the host cell. The viral DNA is then incorporated in the bacterium’s chromosome. Shortly afterwards, binding of the C1 protein to specific sequences on the viral DNA induces the formation of a loop. As long as the loop is closed, the virus remains dormant. If the loop opens, however, the machinery of the bacteria gets hi-jacked: The virus switches off the bacteria’s genes and switches on its own, turning virulent.“The loop basically acts as a molecular switch, and is very stable during quiescence, yet it is highly sensitive to the external environment,” Finzi says. “If the bacteria is starved or poisoned, for instance, the viral DNA receives a signal that it’s time to get off the boat and spread to a new host, and the loop is opened. We wanted to understand how this C1-mediated, loop-based mechanism can be so stable during quiescence,Transient-loop formation, left, occurs due to non-specific binding of proteins (small orange disks) to DNA (black line). DNA is attached at one end to the glass surface of a microscope flow-chamber and at the other end to a magnetic bead (large gray disk) that reacts to the pulling force of a pair of magnets. The weak, non-specific DNA-protein interactions are disrupted as the force increases. (Graphic by Monica Fernandez.) 
and yet so responsive to switching to virulence when it receives the signal to do so.” Finzi runs one of a handful of physics labs using single-molecule techniques to study the mechanics of gene expression. In 2009, her lab proved the formation of the C1 loop. “We then analyzed the kinetics of loop formation and gained evidence that non-specific binding played a role,” Finzi says. “We wanted to build on that work by precisely characterizing that role.” Emory undergraduate student Chandler Fountain led the experimental part of the study. He used magnetic tweezers, which can pull on DNA molecules labeled with miniscule magnetic beads, to stretch DNA in a microscope flow chamber. Gradually, the magnets are moved closer to the DNA, pulling it further, so the length of the DNA extension can be plotted against the applied force. “You get a curve,” Finzi explains. “It’s not linear, because DNA is a spring. Then you put the same DNA in the presence of C1 protein and see how the curve changes. Now, you need more force to get toSpecifically-bound proteins are shown as orange ovals on a thicker part of the DNA sequence and non-specifically bound proteins are portrayed as gray ovals on regular DNA. Non-specific, transient loops facilitate the coming together of the specifically-bound proteins that mediate formation of the “switch loop”. Once this loop is formed, non-specifically bound protein further stabilize it by increasing the length of the closure in a zipper-like effect. (Graphic by Monica Fernandez.)
the same extension because the protein holds onto the DNA and bends it.” An analysis of the data suggests that, while the specific binding of the C1 protein forms the loop, the non-specific binding acts like a kind of zipper, facilitating the closure of the loop, and keeping it stable until the signal comes to open it. “The zipper-like effect of the weaker binding sites also allows the genetic switch to be more responsive to the environment, providing small openings that allow it to breathe, in a sense,” Finzi explains. “So the loop is never permanently closed.” The information about how the C1 genetic switch works may provide insights into the workings of other genetic switches. “Single-molecule techniques have opened a new era in the mechanics of biological processes,” Finzi says. “I hope this kind of experiment will lead to better understanding of how our own DNA is compacted into chromosomes, and how it unravels locally to become expressed.” Other authors on the paper include Sachin Goyal, formerly a post-doc in the Finzi lab; Emory cell biologist David Dunlap; and Emory theoretical physicistFereydoon Family. The research was funded by the National Institutes of Health. Source: eScienceCommons
Read More........

'Blade Runner' blows past our ideas of 'disability'

Paul Root Wolpe, director of the Emory Center for Ethics, wrote about Oscar Pistorius, the South African amputee who is running in the 2012 Olympics, as a guest blogger for CNN.com. Dubbed the “Blade Runner,” for his high-tech, carbon-fiber “Cheetah” legs, Pistorius assembled his own legal and scientific team to make a successful bid to compete in the Olympics. But, as Wolpe writes, the story is far from over, with no general guidelines about the future use of “adaptive sports equipment.” An excerpt from the article: “The issue will have to be revisited by each new athlete who wants to use artificial mechanisms in competition. “We do not ultimately know the degree to which technology mimics true physiological function. What if an amputee high jumper wants to use Cheetahs; what level of springiness is "fair" against able-bodied athletes? What about a swimmer who wants to use prosthetic hands or legs? Or an archer whose prosthetic arm does not tremble like an arm of flesh and blood? We do not have metrics that can determine true equivalence with able-bodied athletes. “Then there is the issue of fairness. In this year's U.S. Olympic trials, Dathan Ritzenhein, the two-time Olympian and 5k American record holder, was eliminated from the marathon team because of leg cramps. Pistorius cannot get cramps in his calves because he does not have any, and so he can never be eliminated based on this criterion. “The Pistorius case confronts us with two important questions. What is a disability? And what is the rationale for elite sport?” Source: eScienceCommons
Read More........

The "Pioneer Anomaly" Solved


The unexpected slowing of NASA's Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft - the so-called "Pioneer Anomaly" - turns out to be due to the slight, but detectable effect of heat pushing back on the spacecraft, according to a recent paper. The heat emanates from electrical current flowing through instruments and the thermoelectric power supply. The results were published on June 12 in the journal Physical Review Letters. "The effect is something like when you're driving a car and the photons from your headlights are pushing you backward," said Slava Turyshev, the paper's lead author at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California. "It is very subtle." Launched in 1972 and 1973 respectively, Pioneer 10 and 11 are on an outward trajectory from our sun. In the early 1980s, navigators saw a deceleration on the two spacecraft, in the direction back toward the sun, as the spacecraft were approaching Saturn. They dismissed it as the effect of dribbles of leftover propellant still in the fuel lines after controllers had cut off the propellant. But by 1998, as the spacecraft kept traveling on their journey and were over 8 billion miles (13 billion kilometers) away from the sun, a group of scientists led by John Anderson of JPL realized there was an actual deceleration of about 300 inches per day squared (0.9 nanometers per second squared). They raised the possibility that this could be some new type of physics that contradicted Einstein's general theory of relativity. In 2004, Turyshev decided to start gathering records stored all over the country and analyze the data to see if he could definitively figure out the source of the deceleration. In part, he and colleagues were contemplating a deep space physics mission to investigate the anomaly, and he wanted to be sure there was one before asking NASA for a spacecraft. He and colleagues went searching for Doppler data, the pattern of data communicated back to Earth from the spacecraft, and telemetry data, the housekeeping data sent back from the spacecraft. At the time these two Pioneers were launched, data were still being stored on punch cards. But Turyshev and colleagues were able to copy digitized files from the computer of JPL navigators who have helped steer the Pioneer spacecraft since the 1970s. They also found over a dozen of boxes of magnetic tapes stored under a staircase at JPL and received files from the National Space Science Data Center at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, and worked with NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, to save some of their boxes of magnetic optical tapes. He collected more than 43 gigabytes of data, which may not seem like a lot now, but is quite a lot of data for the 1970s. He also managed to save a vintage tape machine that was about to be discarded, so he could play the magnetic tapes. The effort was a labor of love for Turyshev and others. The Planetary Society sent out appeals to its members to help fund the data recovery effort. NASA later also provided funding. In the process, a programmer in Canada, Viktor Toth, heard about the effort and contacted Turyshev. He helped Turyshev create a program that could read the telemetry tapes and clean up the old data. They saw that what was happening to Pioneer wasn't happening to other spacecraft, mostly because of the way the spacecraft were built. For example, the Voyager spacecraft are less sensitive to the effect seen on Pioneer, because its thrusters align it along three axes, whereas the Pioneer spacecraft rely on spinning to stay stable. With all the data newly available, Turyshev and colleagues were able to calculate the heat put out by the electrical subsystems and the decay of plutonium in the Pioneer power sources, which matched the anomalous acceleration seen on both Pioneers. "The story is finding its conclusion because it turns out that standard physics prevail," Turyshev said. "While of course it would've been exciting to discover a new kind of physics, we did solve a mystery." Pioneer 10 and 11 were managed by NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif. Pioneer 10's last signal was received on Earth in January 2003. Pioneer 11's last signal was received in November 1995. Illustration credit: NASA, Source: Minsex
Read More........

Artificial Intelligence: Are We Ready for It?

Future of Technology and Impact on HR and Management
When someone says ‘behavioural science’, my mind starts thinking about psychopaths and serial killers. But in the tech world it’s perceived as something entirely different and a lot less violent. Scientists have long studied behaviours, needs, feelings and how they effect human interactions in a bid to simulate human behaviour in machines. Behavioural study is used with natural language processing so that computers understand humans and can in turn simulate them. Machine says hello has put used AI to demonstrate real life applications. Alfie Atkins Says Hello: Alfie is like a virtual friend. He greets the kids when they come close enough and then engages them in a number of activities. He dances with them, plays hide and seek and interacts with them. The best part is that he gauges how the children are reacting to his gestures and responds accordingly. So if the kid is being too mischievous Alfie can get angry. If he is enjoying himself he will appear happy. There can be numerous applications of Alfie in everyday life. Single child parents can get their child a little Alfie to play with. It can do occupational therapy sessions with kids who have minor disabilities by getting them interested in the exercise. Interactive Animals: If you thought James Cameron was the only one who had the smarts to think up new species, you are totally mistaken. Machine says hello has collaborated with Linköping University to create a whole zoo of fantasy animals that interact with each other and with the visitors at the Visualization centre. Source: Sam Daily TimesImage: flickr.com
Read More........

Man or Machine?


Where do men end and machines begin? It’s a question that scientists and ethical philosophers are asking much more seriously at the moment. We all begin to wonder this when we’ve spent four hours online looking for holiday deals, or the best savings rates – technology has become so immersive, particularly in the field of computer games, that we are looking at the dawning of true virtual reality in the next few decades. But the ethics of man combined with machine, particularly in the field of neurotechnology is concerning some. So concerned are they that the highly esteemed Nuffield Council on Bioethics has launched a consultation to look into the issue. The concern centers around the use of mind controlled machines, which are in development at the moment. Neurotechnology: Scientists are already using Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, OCD and stroke, with the use of electrodes passed into the brain and out to a battery pack attached to the body.  Source: The Coming Crisis
Read More........

Believe it or not the British lab is growing human spare parts, now organ donation is a thing of the past


Ananta Sports: 'This is a nose we’re growing for a patient next month,’ Professor Alexander Seifalian says matter-of-factly, plucking a Petri dish from the bench beside him. Inside is an utterly lifelike appendage, swimming in red goo. Alongside it is another dish containing an ear. ‘It’s a world first,’ he says smiling. ‘Nobody has ever grown a nose before.’ His lab is little more than a series of worn wooden desktops strewn with beakers, solutions, taps, medical jars, tubing and paperwork, and looks like a school chemistry lab. But it’s from here that Seifalian leads University College London’s (UCL) Department of Nanotechnology and Regenerative Medicine, which he jokingly calls the ‘human body parts store’.  Seifalian showing Nose made from nanomolecules As he takes me on a tour of his lab I’m bombarded with one medical breakthrough after another. Daily Mail Reporter Said  At one desk he picks up a glass mould that shaped the trachea – windpipe – used in the world’s first synthetic organ transplant. At another are the ingredients for the revolutionary nanomaterial at the heart of his creations, and just beyond that is a large machine with a pale, gossamer-thin cable inside that’s pulsing with what looks like a heartbeat. It’s an artery. ‘We are the first in the world working on this,’ Seifalian says casually to daily mail reporter. ‘We can make a metre every 20 seconds if we need to.’  ‘Other groups have tried to tackle nose replacement with implants but we’ve found they don’t last,’ says Adelola Oseni, one of Seifalian’s team. ‘They migrate, the shape of the nose changes. But our one will hold itself completely, as it’s an entire nose shape made out of polymer.’ Looking like very thin Latex rubber, the polymer is made up of billions of molecules, each measuring just over one nanometre (a billionth of a metre), or 40,000 
times smaller than the width of a human hair. Working at molecular level allows the material itself to be intricately detailed. Ear made in lab  ‘Inside this nanomaterial are thousands of small holes,’ says Seifalian. ‘Tissue grows into these and becomes part of it. It becomes the same as a nose and will even feel like one.’ When the nose is transferred to the patient, it doesn’t go directly onto the face but will be placed inside a balloon inserted beneath the skin on their arm. After four weeks, during which time skin and blood vessels can grow, the nose can be monitored, then it can be transplanted to the face. At the cutting edge of modern medicine, Seifalian and his team are focusing on growing replacement organs and body parts to order using a patient’s own cells. There would be no more waiting for donors or complex reconstruction – just a quick swap. And because the organ is made from the patient’s own cells, the risk of rejection should, in theory, be eliminated. Unsurprisingly, the recipe for the breakthrough biocompatible material used is a closely guarded secret. From those who have lost noses to cancer to others mutilated by injury, it’s hoped this revolutionary process could transform thousands of lives. ‘We seed the patient’s own cells on to the polymer inside a bioreactor,’ says Oseni. This is a sterile environment mirroring the human body’s temperature, blood and oxygen supply. ‘As the cells take hold and multiply, so the polymer becomes coated. The same methods could be applied to all parts of the face to reconstruct those of people who have had severe facial traumas.’ ‘The full success of these implants needs to be tested with a larger number of patients in clinical trials,’ says Seifalian. Such is the speed of progress that regenerative medicine is now moving on from replacing heart valves and rebuilding faces to potentially curing blindness and accelerating the study of some of the most debilitating diseases. The UK is at the forefront of this research, with work on a £54 million MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine in Edinburgh completed earlier this year. Until recently, regenerative medicine focused mostly on embryonic stem cells as these were the most versatile. They are called pluripotent, meaning they have the ability to become any cell type – blood, muscle, etc. By contrast, adult stem cells can replicate themselves endlessly, but only as the cell they began life as – skin cells replicate as skin cells, muscle cells as muscle cells. But the moral debate surrounding embryonic stem cell research is controversial. Stem cells are taken from human embryos, which are destroyed in the process. In 2007, Professor Shinya Yamanaka of Kyoto University managed to create pluripotent cells from adult stem cells, potentially removing the need for embryonic stem cells completely. These are known as induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPSCs. He was in part inspired by Professor Ian Wilmut, who was knighted for his role in the creation of Dolly the cloned sheep. ‘In the same way Dolly made us think maybe we could change cells, Yamanaka proved it could be done,’ says Wilmut. ‘This makes you think you can produce any cell type, producing nerves or muscle from skin cells, for example.’ This has been proved recently with the news that scientists at CambridgeUniversity have created brain cells from skin cells which could help with the search for new treatments for Alzheimer’s, stroke and epilepsy. Sitting on a desk inside Seifalian’s laboratory is the mould for the trachea which he and his team created. It was recently implanted into a patient making it the world’s first ever synthetic organ transplant. The patient in question, a 36-year-old Eritrean man, had a large cancerous tumour in his throat that was rapidly spreading towards his lungs. The transplant was successful, and the patient is now out of hospital and recovering well. On another bench in the lab lies an ear ready for seeding, while next door the team is working on heart valves that won’t even need seeding before implantation, having been developed instead to attract the cells they need once implanted. This will allow them to grow in the body instead of bioreactors and, along with an insertion method that removes the need to open the chest, could revolutionise heart bypass surgery. ‘Normally for heart bypass you take a section of vein from the patient’s leg or arm. But 30 per cent of patients don’t have suitable veins so can’t have the operation. No alternative currently exists for them,’ says Seifalian. ‘We are the first in the world with this. Nobody else is even close. It has been successful in animal trials; this year it will be going for patient trials’. While Seifalian and his team keep developing potential implants, on the other side of London another team led by Professor Pete Coffey, the London Project to Cure Blindness, is using stem cells to tackle age-related macular degeneration, the most common form of age-related sight loss, which affects 513,000 people in the UK alone.  ‘There’s nothing that can be done for those with the disease,’ says Coffey. ‘There’s a real unmet need here.’ The aim is to replace the diseased cells with healthy new ones, restoring vision. Unlike Seifalian’s team, Coffey’s is using embryonic stem cells because in every experiment to date they are the only ones that work. On the issue of working with embryonic stem cells Coffey is clear. ‘One thing I always face is that the term embryo has a different meaning for different people. 'The embryo in this case is five days old, and I know under various religious definitions that’s life, but I see this as similar to organ donation. That embryo cannot survive on its own.’ Most embryonic cells used in research, including Coffey’s, are from IVF treatment where a large surplus of embryos is part of the process. Unwanted embryos can be donated to research, otherwise, as Coffey says, ‘they’re disposed of.’ ‘A human embryonic cell keeps reproducing itself naturally, so one cell generates everything we need – we’ve banked the duplicates in nitrogen chambers in three different countries – which means this cell could service a clinical population of 28 million. Isn’t that worth it?’ Coffey’s project is perhaps the most advanced major regenerative medicine project in the world today, scheduled for clinical trials with patients later this year. But even success in a patient trial is no guarantee a treatment will ever reach the mass market. ‘The sad thing is the time frame here,’ says Paul Whiting, executive director of Pfizer’s regenerative medicine arm, who is working closely with Coffey’s project. ‘Even things that seem close are probably ten years away, while many are 20 to 50 years away. We need to know if these things will do long-term harm before they can reach patients, so it will be a gradual progression over at least 50 years.’ And a recent study illustrates just how far the divide between laboratory success and clinical reality could be: researchers at California University have found that mice treated with iPSCs made from their own skin cells ultimately reject the transplants. When asked about this, Wilmut agrees it was valid but also says it was ‘a very preliminary observation’, another piece of the puzzle leading toward full understanding of the subject. There are also concerns that the reprogramming process used to create iPSCs might cause cancer in those same cells. But back in Seifalian’s labs, the raw energy remains. ‘Before, the idea was you rob Peter to pay Paul, taking one bit of the body to reconstruct another, but now the idea of being able to grow tissues in a lab and to reconstruct the body is huge,’ says Adelola Oseni.‘If we can grow a heart, a lung or a trachea in a lab, we don’t need to wait for donors. 'This work has massive implications for the way we function as clinicians and the way medicine is practised.’ Source : Daily Mail Source: Ananta Sports
Read More........

Dump the mouse, control PC with brain


ANI, London, First we had keyboards and mouse for controlling our computers, before smartphones popularised the touchscreen movement. And then hardware such as the Xbox’s Kinect system made gesture controls feel like second-nature. Now, people are getting ready to enter the world of thought-control, with headsets that can read our minds now available for as little as 300 pounds, and the software to  transform our dreams into actions starting to take shape. Kevin Brown, senior inventor at IBM, works to bridge the gap between budding technology and the practical applications they can provide to society. He is already working hard to make everyday tasks easier through mind control, using headsets like the commercially-available Emotiv Systems headset. The Emotiv headset retails for 299 dollars and can easily be plugged into any recent Windows machine to start working, with apps and games - including Angry Birds - being adapted by enthusiasts to run with simple mind controls. “The current headsets can already pick up a range of sensory input from our brains, and this will only improve over time,” the Daily Mail quoted Kevin, who has been an IBM for 16 years, as saying. “The Emotiv Systems set can pick up a range of emotions - currently whether we are bored or excited, and if we are concentrating on a task or if we are relaxed. “It can also pick up on what our brain is telling our muscles to do, so it can pick up a smile or a frown, and react accordingly.” The cleverest aspect of the system is in picking up our EEG brainwaves. Users can quickly train the software to understand various patterns. “The system is not “reading our minds”, it is instead recognising certain patterns, and passing that information to a control unit which can then respond to that input,” he said. For example, researchers are experimenting at IBM with the idea of the “Connected Home”, where, for instance, lamps are wired into the system. “You can think of turning on the lamp, tell the system that this particular thinking pattern relates to turning on the lamp, and then whenever the headset recognises that pattern, it will send the command to turn on the lamp,” he added. Source: Hindustan TimesImage
Read More........

Japan and US at top of energy-related patents in 2011

Japan and US at top of energy-related patents in 2011
The United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) recently revealed that international patent filings experienced record growth in 2011. Worldwide, electrical machinery, apparatus and energy-related patents accounted for 7% of the total, only superseded by computer technology patents. Applications for international patent filings experienced their fastest growth since 2005 last year, the United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) reported this month, adding that this signals a steady recovery despite difficult global economic conditions. Last year, 181,900 patent applications were filed under the WIPO-administered Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), which facilitates the process of seeking patent protection in multiple countries. This represents an almost 11 per cent growth compared to 2010. China, Japan and the United States accounted for 82 per cent of the total growth, with the Chinese telecommunications company ZTE Corporation filing the most applications in 2011, WIPO stated in a news release. Among the top filing countries, applications from China, Japan, Canada, the Republic of Korea (ROK) and the US saw the fastest growth. European countries witnessed a mixed performance with Switzerland, France, Germany and Sweden experiencing growth, and the Netherlands, Finland, Spain and the United Kingdom seeing declines.  Meanwhile, large middle-income economies such as Russia, Brazil and India recorded double-digit filing growth.  WIPO stated that patents related to digital communications amounted to 7.1 per cent of the total filing, making it the field with the largest share of applications followed by electronic machinery, medical technology and computer technology. Patent applications in selected energy-related technologies  The WIPO report included a sub-section of the development of energy-related technologies containing statistics on patent activity for selected energy-related technologies, namely, fuel cells, geothermal, solar and wind energy.  TotalSource: WIPO
number of patent applications in four energy-related fields  The total number of patent applications in the four energy-related fields reached 28,560 in 2009, almost nine times as much as in 1990. Solar energy-related patent applications account for 50.3% of the total in 2009. There was a substantial increase in solar and wind energy patent applications, while those in the field of fuel cell technology saw a small drop in the last two years. Share of total energy-related patents by country According to the WIPO’s figures, Japan (34.1%), the Republic of Korea (18.7%) and the US (14%)  accounted for more than two-thirds of total solar energy patent applications. However, only the Republic of Korea (1.6%) and China (1.1%) have more than one percent of their total PCT patent applications published in this field.  For fuel cell technology, Japan accounted for more than half of all patent applications in this field. For Japan (1.3%) and Canada (1.0%), more than one percent of their total patent applications are in this field.  Patent applications in the field of wind energy technology are more evenly distributed among several countries, with Germany and the US accounting for a similar share (around 17%). However, only in Denmark (3.1%) and Spain (1.6%) did patenting in this field represent more than one percent of total filings.  The distribution of geothermal energy patent applications is similar to that for wind energy technology. Absolute numbers and relative shares of geothermal energy patents are very low. Source: Renewable Energy Magazine
Read More........

Super-human brain technology sparks ethics debate

Human brain
A British ethics group has launched a debate on the ethical dilemmas posed by new technologies that tap into the brain  and could bring super-human strength, highly enhanced concentration or thought-controlled weaponry.  With the prospect of future conflicts between armies controlling weapons with their minds, the Nuffield Council on Bioethics launched a consultation on Thursday to consider the risks of blurring the lines between humans and machines. Intervening in the brain has always raised both hopes and fears in equal measure. Hopes of curing terrible diseases, and fears about the consequences of trying to enhance human capability beyond what is normally possible, said Thomas Baldwin, a professor of philosophy at Britain's York University who is leading the study.  These challenge us to think carefully about fundamental questions to do with the brain: What makes us human? What makes us an individual? And how and why do we think and behave in the way we do?.  The Council, an independent body which looks at ethical issues raised by new developments in biology and medicine, wants to focus on three main areas of neurotechnologies that change the brain: brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), neurostimulation techniques such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and neural stem cell therapy. These technologies are already at various stages of development for use in the treatment of medical conditions including Parkinson's disease, depression and stroke, and experts think they could bring significant benefits, especially for patients with severe brain disease or damage. GROWING FAST:  But they also have huge potential outside the health context. In military applications, BCIs are being used to develop weapons or vehicles controlled remotely by brain signals, and there is big commercial scope in the gaming industry with the development of computer games controlled by people's thoughts.  Speaking at a briefing to launch the consultation, Baldwin said the estimated total global market for all neurotechnologies - including pharmaceuticals for the treatment of brain disorders - is around $150 billion. Setting pharmaceuticals aside, the value of the market for the devices and technologies we are dealing with is something in the region of $8 billion, and growing fast, he said. Kevin Warwick, a professor of Cybernetics at the University of Reading and a supporter of more neurotechnology research, said some experimental brain technologies had great potential in medicine. From the brain signals, a brain computer interface could translate a person's desire to move ... and then use those signals to operate a wheelchair or other piece of technology, he said. For someone who has locked-in syndrome, for example, and cannot communicate, a BCI could be life-changing. But he and Baldwin also stressed there are concerns about safety of some experimental techniques that involve implants in the brain, and about the ethics of using such technology in other medicine and other fields. If brain-computer interfaces are used to control military aircraft or weapons from far away, who takes ultimate responsibility for the actions? Could this be blurring the line between man and machine? Baldwin said. The ethics council's consultation is at www.nuffieldbioethics.org/neurotechnology. The deadline for responses is April 23 and it expects to publish a report with recommendations in 2013. Source: Indian Express
Read More........