70% Drop in Levels of Forever Chemicals Observed in Seabird Eggs Tracks Regulatory Success

Northern gannets on Bonaventure Island – credit, CC 3.0. BY-SA Bodoklecksel

Content of several “forever chemicals” in seabird eggs were found to have sharply decreased over the last 55 years by a team of scientists.

While first rising exponentially from during the 1960s, the chemicals, classed as PFAS, peaked in the 1990s before decreasing in line with regulatory oversight by North American governments.

PFAS are a class of chemicals that form water, stain, and heat-resistant coatings in multiple products which substantially contaminate environments around the world, and are linked to multiple detrimental health outcomes.

A study published in the journal Applied Toxicology that looked at PFAS concentrations in the eggs of northern gannets on Bonaventure Island found that the content of some of the most commonly used PFAS has fallen 70% and sometimes more.

These include perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), which fell 74% and 40% respectively. Concentrations of perfluorohexanesulfonic acid, (PFHxS) another of these chemicals, was also 70% lower from baseline.

“We see this incredible rise to a peak where concentrations seem to be higher than toxicological threshold for those birds, then it really decreases in a nice way,” Raphael Lavoie, a co-author and ecotoxicologist with Environment and Climate Change Canada, told the Guardian. “The regulations are having a good effect.”

The seabird subjects and the long study period were notable strengths. The 55 years of data spans the rise in PFAS production, and the eventual decline as the environmental groups and regulators caught on to the toxicity in the late 90s and early 2000s.

Bonaventure Island is the world’s largest northern gannet breeding colony. These pescatarian birds are directly exposed to PFAS contamination due to the island’s position near the St. Lawrence Seaway, which, being connected to the Great Lakes manufacturing centers north and south of the border, was exposed to substantial amounts of PFAS during the 20th century.

The PFAS got into the fish which got into the gannets and then into their eggs. Tom Perkins for the Guardian wrote that in the late 90s, the chemical corporation M3 dramatically scaled back its production of commercial PFAS in the face of regulatory scrutiny. In 2015, the chemical sector struck an agreement with the EPA to phase out production of PFOA and PFOS, while 6 years earlier at the United Nations’ Stockholm Convention, several of the chemicals tested for in the study were subjected to elimination.

This included PFOA and PFHxS, while PFOS was restricted in everything but firefighting foam.

The study is a comprehensive demonstration of how these regulations are working to reduce the toxic load presented by PFAS in the environment. PFAS are referred to shorthanded as “forever chemicals,” however, and so the authors stress the need for continual environmental and regulatory vigilance, since any similar chemicals entering the environment today will remain, presumably forever. 70% Drop in Levels of Forever Chemicals Observed in Seabird Eggs Tracks Regulatory Success
Read More........

What ‘biodegradable’ packaging really means – and 3 key questions to ask about it

“Biodegradable” has become one of the most reassuring words in modern packaging. It appears on coffee cups, shopping bags and food containers, implying a promise: this product is better for the environment because nature will eventually take care of it.

However, biodegradability is not a simple yes-or-no property. It exists in shades, which we can measure.

Biodegradation is a complex process. Microbes and molecules present in an environment such as soil attack a material and digest it, much like what happens to food in our gut.

A material is typically defined as biodegradable if it is digested “well” by the environment in which it is placed. The more mass the material loses during digestion, and the more carbon dioxide it produces, the more biodegradable it is.

Different environments digest materials in different ways. Temperature, sunlight, oxygen, moisture and microbial diversity all influence how quickly materials degrade.

Even the most rigorous testing cannot fully capture the complexity of the real world – but it can help guide our choices.

Biodegradability is relative

In the lab we can simulate environments such as landfill, home compost bins and industrial compost facilities. If we understand in which settings a material breaks down better, we can tell the consumer how to best dispose of it and prevent pollution and other issues.

A material that decomposes quickly in an industrial composting facility may persist for years in the ocean or landfill.

Industrial composting systems maintain elevated temperatures, controlled aeration and consistent moisture. Hot, moist and oxygen-rich conditions generally aid biodegradation but they are not easy to come by in a backyard compost bin.

Home compost systems are typically cooler and more variable. The result: a material certified for industrial composting may not break down effectively at home.

Take polylactic acid (PLA), a biodegradable material generally considered to be a greener alternative to common plastics (like PET). PLA can biodegrade effectively in an industrial composting system. With temperatures above 60°C and controlled moisture, oxygen and microbial activity, microbes can convert PLA into carbon dioxide, water and biomass in just a few days.

Outside these conditions, the story changes. If PLA ends up in landfill, decomposition can be slow because oxygen is limited. In rivers or marine environments, it may persist for years and act as a raft for “alien” species. In your compost bin or worm farm it might disappear in a few months.

Time for standards

There are many ways to measure biodegradability. One common series of tests, OECD 301 assesses “ready biodegradability” in different environments as a material’s ability to biodegrade around 60% within 28 days under controlled conditions.

Industrially compostable materials are tested under very specific conditions. Standards such as EN 13432, used in Europe, assess whether packaging can successfully break down in industrial composting facilities.

To meet the standard, at least 90% of the material must biodegrade into carbon dioxide, water and biomass within six months. These tests typically involve elevated temperatures, controlled aeration, and moisture.

Most biodegradable plastic materials do not disappear cleanly. Instead, they fragment into progressively smaller particles before fully breaking down. During this period, the fragments will continue interacting with organisms and ecosystems.

Compost bins too can get indigestion

Biodegradability standards are helpful for consumers and waste regulators. Nevertheless, they are limited. They often do not test how much of any given material a specific disposal system can sustain at any one time.

This is an important parameter to take into account. Take food waste. When large quantities of food lie in landfill without oxygen, they generate methane, a greenhouse gas far more potent than carbon dioxide over short timescales.

Other biodegradable materials are no different and can throw out the balance of an ecosystem such as your compost bin, if added in excessive quantities.

Introducing certain materials to a compost bin might also cause certain microbes to thrive and others to suffer, sometimes with unintended consequences, such as making your compost bin smell bad.

In the future, biodegradability tests will likely be paired with ecotoxicity assessments, to help us understand whether a material breaks down safely and without generating harmful byproducts or microbial imbalances.

What can we do?

Few of us have an industrial composting facility nearby to take care of biodegradable materials. Industrially compostable products such as coffee cups often end up sent to landfill alongside conventional waste.

This does not mean individuals are powerless or that biodegradable materials are inherently bad.

You can start by checking local council guidance and choosing products certified for the systems available in your area, or your compost bin.

Ask yourself:

  • is this product home compostable or only industrially compostable?

  • is there infrastructure locally that can process it?

  • has it been independently certified?

As for industrially compostable coffee cups, check that you can return cups to participating cafes. They should not be placed in standard recycling bins or food and organics bins as they are considered contaminants. If unsure, place them in a bin destined for landfill.

Ultimately, the most sustainable option remains a reusable washable cup.

These may seem like small actions but they help push packaging design and waste systems toward greater transparency and accountability.

Moving beyond simple labels

As consumers, we want to make educated choices about their purchases and how they can be disposed of.

For now, we have simple labels. In the future, we will hopefully have more complete information about how materials degrade in industrial composting facilities, home compost bins, soil, freshwater, sea water and landfill sites.

Biodegradable materials offer clear advantages over highly persistent materials, but the term “biodegradable” should not be mistaken for environmentally harmless.

Let’s just remember that a biodegradable material released in the wrong place, at the wrong scale, or under the wrong conditions may behave not very differently from a non-biodegradable material.

Understanding the shades of biodegradability moves the conversation beyond simplistic labels. Nature can break many things down, eventually. The more important question is whether it can do so without getting indigestion.The Conversation

Martin Zaki, Associate Research Fellow in Biomaterials, Deakin University and Alessandra Sutti, Associate Professor, Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read More........