Scientists shocked to discover new species of green anaconda, the world’s biggest snake

The green anaconda has long been considered one of the Amazon’s most formidable and mysterious animals. Our new research upends scientific understanding of this magnificent creature, revealing it is actually two genetically different species. The surprising finding opens a new chapter in conservation of this top jungle predator.

Green anacondas are the world’s heaviest snakes, and among the longest. Predominantly found in rivers and wetlands in South America, they are renowned for their lightning speed and ability to asphyxiate huge prey then swallow them whole.

My colleagues and I were shocked to discover significant genetic differences between the two anaconda species. Given the reptile is such a large vertebrate, it’s remarkable this difference has slipped under the radar until now.

Conservation strategies for green anacondas must now be reassessed, to help each unique species cope with threats such as climate change, habitat degradation and pollution. The findings also show the urgent need to better understand the diversity of Earth’s animal and plant species before it’s too late.

Scientists discovered a new snake species known as the northern green anaconda. Bryan Fry

An impressive apex predator

Historically, four anaconda species have been recognised, including green anacondas (also known as giant anacondas).

Green anacondas are true behemoths of the reptile world. The largest females can grow to more than seven metres long and weigh more than 250 kilograms.

The snakes are well-adapted to a life lived mostly in water. Their nostrils and eyes are on top of their head, so they can see and breathe while the rest of their body is submerged. Anacondas are olive-coloured with large black spots, enabling them to blend in with their surroundings.

The snakes inhabit the lush, intricate waterways of South America’s Amazon and Orinoco basins. They are known for their stealth, patience and surprising agility. The buoyancy of the water supports the animal’s substantial bulk and enables it to move easily and leap out to ambush prey as large as capybaras (giant rodents), caimans (reptiles from the alligator family) and deer.

Green anacondas are not venomous. Instead they take down prey using their large, flexible jaws then crush it with their strong bodies, before swallowing it.

As apex predators, green anacondas are vital to maintaining balance in their ecosystems. This role extends beyond their hunting. Their very presence alters the behaviour of a wide range of other species, influencing where and how they forage, breed and migrate.

Anacondas are highly sensitive to environmental change. Healthy anaconda populations indicate healthy, vibrant ecosystems, with ample food resources and clean water. Declining anaconda numbers may be harbingers of environmental distress. So knowing which anaconda species exist, and monitoring their numbers, is crucial.

To date, there has been little research into genetic differences between anaconda species. Our research aimed to close that knowledge gap.

Green anaconda have large, flexible jaws. Pictured: a green anaconda eating a deer. JESUS RIVAS

Untangling anaconda genes

We studied representative samples from all anaconda species throughout their distribution, across nine countries.

Our project spanned almost 20 years. Crucial pieces of the puzzle came from samples we collected on a 2022 expedition to the Bameno region of Baihuaeri Waorani Territory in the Ecuadorian Amazon. We took this trip at the invitation of, and in collaboration with, Waorani leader Penti Baihua. Actor Will Smith also joined the expedition, as part of a series he is filming for National Geographic.

We surveyed anacondas from various locations throughout their ranges in South America. Conditions were difficult. We paddled up muddy rivers and slogged through swamps. The heat was relentless and swarms of insects were omnipresent.

We collected data such as habitat type and location, and rainfall patterns. We also collected tissue and/or blood from each specimen and analysed them back in the lab. This revealed the green anaconda, formerly believed to be a single species, is actually two genetically distinct species.

The first is the known species, Eunectes murinus, which lives in Perú, Bolivia, French Guiana and Brazil. We have given it the common name “southern green anaconda”. The second, newly identified species is Eunectes akayima or “northern green anaconda”, which is found in Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Trinidad, Guyana, Suriname and French Guiana.

We also identified the period in time where the green anaconda diverged into two species: almost 10 million years ago.

The two species of green anaconda look almost identical, and no obvious geographical barrier exists to separate them. But their level of genetic divergence – 5.5% – is staggering. By comparison, the genetic difference between humans and apes is about 2%.

The two green anaconda species live much of their lives in water. Shutterstock

Preserving the web of life

Our research has peeled back a layer of the mystery surrounding green anacondas. This discovery has significant implications for the conservation of these species – particularly for the newly identified northern green anaconda.

Until now, the two species have been managed as a single entity. But each may have different ecological niches and ranges, and face different threats.

Tailored conservation strategies must be devised to safeguard the future of both species. This may include new legal protections and initiatives to protect habitat. It may also involve measures to mitigate the harm caused by climate change, deforestation and pollution — such as devastating effects of oil spills on aquatic habitats.

Our research is also a reminder of the complexities involved in biodiversity conservation. When species go unrecognised, they can slip through the cracks of conservation programs. By incorporating genetic taxonomy into conservation planning, we can better preserve Earth’s intricate web of life – both the species we know today, and those yet to be discovered.The Conversation

Bryan G. Fry, Professor of Toxicology, School of the Environment, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Read More........

Mikado Pheasant Endangered Conservation


Male Mikado Pheasant
GIS was used to extrapolate characteristics of areas containing Mikado Pheasants (Syrmaticus mikado) to determine the total land area available to this endemic, mountainous species. This information is needed for locating additional populations of the pheasant and for determining its IUCN status of extinction risk.Syrmaticus mikado have been observed along roads and trails passing through primary, secondary, and managed forested and grassland habitats between the elevations of 1600 and 3300 m. In Taiwan, the extent of these habitats between the elevations of 1600-3300 m amounts to 205,181 ha. Of this, 52% (105,733 ha) is protected within three national parks, five protected areas, and seven nature reserves. Based on these general estimates, S.mikado should not be considered an endangered species. This conclusion should be taken with caution, however, as not all the area described here may be suitable, and actual conditions within protected areas are unknown.The dilemma of all conservation biologists is that of funding and time. Currently there is much effort in developing models that may help predict the status of species or their risk of extinction (e.g. Ratner et al. 1997, Vucetich et al. 1997, and Findlay & Houlahan 1997) and that may help determine geographic locations or hot spots that need protection in order to conserve a species or group of species (e.g. Kiester et al. 1996, Brooks et al. 1997). Only recently have Geographic Information Systems (GIS) begun to play a role in the creation and testing of these models. Meanwhile, there is a great deal of work being done to determine or estimate the distribution and status of species of concern (papers in Jenkens 1993). Increasingly, GIS is being used to correlate habitat with distribution (e.g. Knick & Dyer 1997, Waller & Mace 1997). The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) has recently published revised Red List categories (Species Survival Commission 1994). Species are placed into certain threat categories (critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable) based on the status of their population, if known, or the extent and status of their distribution range, described as extent of occurrence. Estimating the
Female Mikado Pheasant
extent of occurrence and determining that this range is either fragmented or declining is one way to place a species within the three categories of threat listed by the Species Survival Commission (1994). A species is considered critically endangered if the extent of its occurrence is less than 100 km2. It is listed as endangered if the extent of its occurrence is less than 5000 km2, and it is considered vulnerable if less than 20,000 km2. For all three categories, the amount of habitat within this range, or the population of the species itself, must also be demonstrated to be fragmented or declining (Species Survival Commission 1994). Most Galliformes are naturally rare and have limited ranges (King 1981), a fact which greatly increases theirrisks of extinction (Simberloff 1994). Of all the bird orders, the order Galliformes has the third highest number of threatened species (64), following the passerines (497) and parrots (71). Hunting pressure and habitat loss account for 63% of the threats to Galliformes (data compiled from King 1981). Of the pheasant species within this order, 96% are threatened by hunting or habitat loss, and the habitat requirements of 17% have yet to be studied at all (McGowan & Garson 1995). It is only recently that Syrmaticus mikado has been classified as safe (McGowan & Garson 1995), upgraded from threatened with extinction (Groombridge 1993-1994). The pheasant is endemic to Taiwan and is still considered endangered in Taiwan (Lee & Yang 1993). Therefore,
the status of this species remains in debate. Here, we develop a GIS model of S. mikado habitat to estimate the extent of occurrence as an initial step towards determining this species' category of threat. This model is based on the assumptions that the pheasant is found only in forested and grassland habitat between 1600 and 3300 m in elevation. These assumptions can only estimate the maximum amount of habitat available to the bird; it is unlikely that it occurs in all habitats described in this model. Further study of habitats actually used by the pheasant and of its population demographics are needed to refine and to test the utility of such a rough model for use with S. mikado or other species. Source: AnimalDiscovery
Read More........

176 new species of animals discovered in India

Kolkata, June 3During last year, field biologists discovered 176 species of animals from India, which are new to science, states the Zoological Survey of India. According to official records by ZSI responsible for animal taxonomy under the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, 176 new species were discovered, described and reported from all over India last year. Insects, which escape attention due to its size in areas with dense undergrowth, leads the pack among the animal kingdom as 93 new species of the invertebrates were found. The list includes 23 species of fishes, 24 amphibian species like frogs, toads, etc, two species of reptiles, 12 species of arachnida (spiders) and 12 crustacean (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, etc). Most of these discoveries have been made by ZSI scientists working across the country. "The species we have discovered are available only from a very small geographical area. Therefore they may be on the verge of extinction already. Habitat destruction is the main cause," ZSI director Dr K Venkataraman said. Many of the new species have been found from the biodiversity-rich areas in the Eastern Ghats, Western Ghats and Northeast states. Home to a number of rare and endemic species, India has two global biodiversity hot spots - Eastern Himalayas and The Western Ghats. Besides this, India's north-east falls under the Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot while the Andaman and Nicobar islands is a part of the Sundaland hotspot. ZSI estimates that from India around 96,500 species of animals including the single-celled protozoa have been reported till now which is around 6.7 per cent of the total number of animal species reported from all over the world. Besides the new discoveries, 61 species of animals have also been reported for the first time in India. The list includes 19 species of insects, 16 species of cnidaria (which include corals), 7 species of arachnids (spiders, mites, etc), 2 fishes, 1 reptiles, 16 species of Cnidaria (corals, etc). PTI Source: http://www.tribuneindia.com
Read More........